|"You take the case, for example—the key thing is, Galileo: a fraud and a faker. And the influence of Galileo, who was actually a sort of a high priest for Paolo Sarpi, in developing this crazy system of empiricism, uses one method. But Kepler uses another method: Kepler’s thing, especially on the question of his so-called “Third Law,” the harmonics, recognizes that there is a different sense organ than either sight or hearing, expressed in the laws of the universe: something which is neither. And that is what he wrestles with, in dealing with this question of the organization of the Solar System."|
Note: Larouche misses the point (and contradicts himself): Galileo shocked the beliefs of his time after he used TECHNOLOGY (a telescope) to see what eyes couldn't! He is rightly considered as the founding father of modern science and scientific method.
Letter to Johannes Kepler (1596), as quoted in The Story of Civilization : The Age of Reason Begins, 1558-1648 (1935) by Will Durant, p. 603"
After Galileo published his Starry Messenger, Kepler wrote a glowing open letter of admiration to Galileo, and this helped Galileo obtain a post as court mathematician to Cosimo II Medici, Grand Duke of Tuscany, despite the hostility and skepticism of Italian astronomers about Galileo's findings.
In the 1633 trial of Galileo Galilei, two worlds come into cosmic conflict. Galileo's world of science and humanism collides with the world of Scholasticism and absolutism that held power in the Catholic Church. The result is a tragedy that marks both the end of Galileo's liberty and the end of the Italian Renaissance.... (from http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/galileo/galileo.html)
Correspondence between Galileo Galilei and Johannes Kepler
[Galileo to Kepler, 1597]
....Like you, I accepted the Copernicun position several years ago and discovered from thence the causes of many natural effects which are doubtless inexplicable by the current theories. I have written up many of my reasons and refutations on the subject, but I have not dared until now to bring them into the open, being warned by the fortunes of Copernicus himself, our master, who procured immortal fame among a few but stepped down among the great crowd (for the foolish are numerous), only to be derided and dishonored. I would dare publish my thoughts if there were many like you; but, since there are not, I shall forebear....
[Kepler to Galileo, 1597]
....I could only have wished that you, who have so profound an insight, would choose another way. You advise
us, by your personal example, and in discreetly veiled fashion, to retreat before the general ignorance and not to
expose ourselves or heedlessly to oppose the violent attacks of the mob of scholars (and in this you follow Plato
and Pythagoras, our true perceptors). But after a tremendous task has been begun in our time, first by
Copernicus and then by many very learned mathematicians, and when the assertion that the Earth moves can no
longer be considered something new, would it not be much better to pull the wagon to its goal by our joint
efforts, now that we have got it under way, and gradually, with powerful voices, to shout down the common
herd, which really does not weigh the arguments very carefully? Thus perhaps by cleverness we may bring it to
a knowledge of the truth. With your arguments you would at the same time help your comrades who endure so
many unjust judgments, for they would obtain either comfort from your agreement or protection from your
influential position. It is not only your Italians who cannot believe that they move if they do not feel it, but we
in Germany also do not by any means endear ourselves with this idea. Yet there are ways by which we protect
ourselves against these difficulties....
Be of good cheer, Galileo, and come out publicly. If I judge correctly, there are only a few of the distinguished mathematicians of Europe who would part company with us, so great is the power of truth. If Italy seems a less favorable place for your publication, and if you look for difficulties there, perhaps Germany will allow us this freedom.
The Trial of Galileo http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/galileo/letterkepler.html
Papal Condemnation (Sentence) of Galileo (June 22, 1633)
Whereas you, Galileo, son of the late Vaincenzo Galilei, Florentine, aged seventy years, were in the year 1615 denounced
to this Holy Office for holding as true the false doctrine taught by some that the Sun is the center of the world and
immovable and that the Earth moves, and also with a diurnal motion; for having disciples to whom you taught the same
doctrine; for holding correspondence with certain mathematicians of Germany concerning the same; for having printed
certain letters, entitled "On the Sunspots," wherein you developed the same doctrine as true; and for replying to the
objections from the Holy Scriptures, which from time to time were urged against it, by glossing the said Scriptures
according to your own meaning: and whereas there was thereupon produced the copy of a document in the form of a
letter, purporting to be written by you to one formerly your disciple, and in this divers propositions are set forth, following
the position of Copernicus, which are contrary to the true sense and authority of Holy Scripture:
This Holy Tribunal being therefore of intention to proceed against the disorder and mischief thence resulting, which went on increasing to the prejudice of the Holy Faith, by command of His Holiness and of the Most Eminent Lords Cardinals of this supreme and universal Inquisition, the two propositions of the stability of the Sun and the motion of the Earth were by the theological Qualifiers qualified as follows:
The proposition that the Sun is the center of the world and does not move from its place is absurd and false philosophically and formally heretical, because it is expressly contrary to Holy Scripture.
The proposition that the Earth is not the center of the world and immovable but that it moves, and also with a diurnal motion, is equally absurd and false philosophically and theologically considered at least erroneous in faith.
But whereas it was desired at that time to deal leniently with you, it was decreed at the Holy Congregation held before His Holiness on the twenty-fifth of February, 1616, that his Eminence the Lord Cardinal Bellarmine should order you to abandon altogether the said false doctrine and, in the event of your refusal, that an injunction should be imposed upon you by the Commissary of the Holy Office to give up the said doctrine and not to teach it to others, not to defend it, nor even to discuss it; and your failing your acquiescence in this injunction, that you should be imprisoned. In execution of this decree, on the following day at the palace of and in the presence of the Cardinal Bellarmine, after being gently admonished by the said Lord Cardinal, the command was enjoined upon you by the Father Commissary of the Holy Office of that time, before a notary and witnesses, that you were altogether to abandon the said false opinion and not in the future to hold or defend or teach it in any way whatsoever, neither verbally nor in writing; and upon your promising to obey, you were dismissed.
And in order that a doctrine so pernicious might be wholly rooted out and not insinuate itself further to the grave prejudice of Catholic truth, a decree was issued by the Holy Congregation of the Index prohibiting the books which treat of this doctrine and declaring the doctrine itself to be false and wholly contrary to the sacred and divine Scripture.